Rosslyn Renaissance's 20'th annual meeting celebrated Rosslyn's development. Rosslyn has experienced about a fifty-fold increase in commercial building space since 1961:
- 1961: 200,000 sq. ft. of commercial space
- 1968: 1,988,400 sq. ft.
- 1981: 5,519,150 sq. ft.
- 1995: 7,691,000 sq. ft.
- 2010: 9,344,650 sq. ft.
Four major planning efforts are helping to guide Rosslyn's development. One is the Rosslyn Building Heights Study. Another is the Rosslyn Multimodal Transportation Plan. A third is the work of Rosslyn Renaissance's Urban Design Committee. A fourth is the Rosslyn Gateway Park Master Plan. Let's hope that this planning work is better than the planning that produced the renovation of Hillside Park.
The meeting recognize the work of Rosslyn Renaissance leaders over the past twenty years. Past Rosslyn Renaissance presidents David Morrison (1991-1994), Maurice Fleiss (1996-1998), Brian Coulter (2000-2004), David W. Briggs (2005-2008), and Jeffrey L. Kovach (2009-present) reminisced about Rosslyn's developments. All recognized the outstanding work of Cecilia Cassidy, Rosslyn Renaissance's Executive Director. She has led Rosslyn Renaissance since the organization's inception twenty years ago.
Rosslyn Renaissance will celebrate its twentieth anniversary with twenty special events. One is likely to be a showing of a special Rosslyn video on the jumbotron at the Light Up Rosslyn ceremony. Another will be a display in February in the Artisphere's Works-In-Progress Gallery of development work in progress in Rosslyn. The Ode Street Tribune's network of covert sources are aggressively pursuing leads concerning the other eighteen events. Stay tuned here for the latest breaking news on top Rosslyn stories.
* * * * *
Note: Commercial space figures listed above are from Monday Properties posters displayed at the Rosslyn Renaissance meeting. The figures are labeled "Rosslyn commercial inventory".
Update: Congressman Moran apparently was not well briefed. The National Park Service is still considering various options, including no boathouse.
5 comments:
A question: You mention a number of studies. Are there any studies that seek to determine, "what type of development will reduce property taxes". We should know if "a fifty-fold increase in commercial building space since 1961" has been instrumental in increasing or in decreasing taxes. My opinion is that more commercial development means higher taxes. I would love to see a study that proves me wrong.
I don't know of any such studies. My crude analysis: roughly 50% of Arlington taxes go to support Arlington public schools. Commercial buildings that attract non-resident workers don't contribute to schooling expenses. In addition, public costs to provide infrastructure (electricity, water, sewage) have economies of scale, i.e. cheaper per person for large buildings than dispersed residences. So I think that more commercial development means lower taxes compared to more residential development, and probably compared to no development.
That analysis shouldn't be interpreted as an argument for commercial development. Quality of life concerns much more than just the tax level.
Your analysis reflects "the conventional thinking". However, it is interesting to note that California and New York have the highest taxes. Wyoming has to lowest.
Have to agree with Anonymous #2. The taxes in rural Shenandoah County, Va are half those of any of the urban tax districts in our area.
Great news about the boathouse. Thanks for covering this meeting. Any idea what got approved (floating/standing, square footage, location, uses, etc) and what the next steps are to make it happen?
Rep. Moran said nothing other than that NPS has agreed to the boathouse. If I get more details, I'll post them.
Post a Comment